- We quantify age and pollutant mixing that occurs due to (A) in-well mixing (B) aquifer heterogeneity (C) dispersion and (D) diffusion
- In-well mixing dominates age/pollutant concentrations in large production wells, followed by aquifer heterogeneity effects
- Typical age and pollutant mixing for a group of wells can be obtained from simplified models
- Predicting the exact outcomes at a particular well is not possible, but the uncertainty about a specific prediction is somewhat less for large production wells than for small domestic or monitoring wells.
- For accurate predictions of a wells pollutant history and future, we would need detailed information on climate, hydrology, soil and aquifer geology, and on the historic and future management of the landscape (water, pollutants, age tracers etc) in a groundwater basin
Understanding the mixing of groundwater age and of nonpoint source (NPS) pollutants in water samples is crucial for interpreting age tracer and NPS pollutant data from production wells. Traditionally, diffusion and mechanical dispersion have been key mixing processes embedded in physical models for simulating and interpreting age tracer and NPS pollutant data. Also, a large body of literature highlights mixing due to aquifer heterogeneity across scales. Importantly, the collection of water samples through wells introduces additional mixing across the internal volume of the well screen. Here, we investigate and quantify the magnitude of mixing due to these four processes—diffusion, mechanical dispersion, aquifer heterogeneity, and in-well mixing—through a Monte Carlo-based modeling framework and sensitivity study. We consider wells in a typical unconsolidated alluvial aquifer system. We find that in-well mixing and aquifer heterogeneity dominate the mixing process in larger production wells. In small production wells and in monitoring wells, diffusion and (sub-grid scale) mechanical dispersion add significantly to age/pollutant mixing. Across an ensemble of larger production wells (e.g., in regional planning), the range of age (or pollutant) mixing observed is dominated by in-well mixing, with aquifer heterogeneity not significantly changing the age mixing distribution. The depth of the well screen has some impact on age mixing only in small (monitoring) wells. Our work suggests that ensemble age (or mixed NPS pollutant concentration) distributions across large sets of production wells can be satisfactorily estimated from well construction information and by considering advective transport in equivalent homogeneous media.
Henri, C., G.E. Fogg, T. Harter, 2026. Groundwater Age and Nonpoint Source Pollutant Mixing in Alluvial Aquifer Wells: Comparing the Role of Diffusion, Dispersion, Aquifer Heterogeneity, and Well Screen Length, Water Resour. Res. 61, e2025WR040063. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR040063